Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 06:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 191
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 804
67% 582 Pts
64-Core 1835
114% 1835 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$299
MSI(1462 5160) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 104
Parallax 144
129% 136 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 126
Splatting 103
110% 140 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xg7000-1tb 2280 1TB
606GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 1897 1659 821 661 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,134
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,890
SusWrite 1,258
403% 1,796 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 50.8
165% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 610
426% 543 MB/s
Poor: 238%
This bench: 236%
Great: 577%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
149GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 67 67 68 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 77.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 44.9
SusWrite 67.7
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
932GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 116 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 113
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.5% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 5R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 20% 25 212 57 144 27" 2560 1377 RTD2700 27QH1800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback