Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X441MA_X441MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X441MA_X441MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X441MA
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210121
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 02:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 30.9
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 94.3
33% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 98.3
8-Core 97.2
13% 97.8 Pts
64-Core 99.5
6% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1DF0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 91 73 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 128
Write 131
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 95
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 4% 68 49 39 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO2D3C
Typical VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X441MA_X441MA Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X441MA_X441MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback