MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 622
72% 562 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 60.5
48% 62.3 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 53.9
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
120GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 553
Mixed 740
195% 890 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 13.4
81% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 43.1
DQ Mixed 45.6
31% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 114%
Great: 157%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
89GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 515
Write 415
Mixed 422
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 23.6
101% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 13.8
15% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,996
Write 1,239
Mixed 1,340
337% 1,525 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 14.2
98% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 36.8
33% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 186%
Great: 236%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 156
Mixed 151
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.33
123% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 145
Mixed 119
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 5.21
4K Mixed 0.65
197% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 94%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
7GB free, PID 4000
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 20.6
29% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.77
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 1.41
140% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C15-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C14-16GTZKY 04CD F4-3200C15-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C14-16GTZKY 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 31.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 1,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,302
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback