Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime22 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 01:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 271
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 817
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Asus(1043 05DB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 130
55% 91.9 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 33.7
57% 75.8 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 27 37 33 27 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 469
Write 270
Mixed 105
SusWrite 37.3
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 10
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 11.6
31% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.2
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 22.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 HSD0000 HL274HPB PLUS
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback