Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 days ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 01:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 632
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 110
Parallax 101
81% 104 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 97
Splatting 98.5
80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 84 77 88 84 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 199
Write 117
Mixed 125
SusWrite 86.4
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 24.5
37% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 86%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 425 429 429 424 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 408
Mixed 296
SusWrite 424
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 31.6
114% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 167
174% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$72
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 182 177 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 135
Mixed 112
SusWrite 178
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.1% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 3R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 17% 104 214 59 144 27" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix G27C2
Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback