Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 01:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 307
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 912
95% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$285
Gigabyte(1458 4147) ≥ 4GB; gigabyte eagle oc ice
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 133
Parallax 153
134% 150 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
115% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 316 282 280 286 279 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 1,487
Mixed 1,295
SusWrite 476
257% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58.7
196% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 844
635% 854 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 181%
Great: 250%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 35.6
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 34.6
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback