Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 16:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 414
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 37.6
28% 40 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.1
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fury 256GB 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R6371
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 34 20 12 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 370
Write 160
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 22.9
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 1.3
27% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 29.7
29% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 164 164 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 152
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 165
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G F4-2400C15-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 25.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 29 60 0" 1920 1017 24W_LCD_TV
Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback