Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17P2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Stealth 17Studio A13VH
MotherboardMSI MS-17P2  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 16:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 70.1
1-Core 183
2-Core 367
106% 207 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,239
120% 989 Pts
64-Core 2,134
132% 2,134 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 257
Parallax 274
200% 259 fps
MRender 401
Gravity 220
Splatting 169
204% 263 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 181%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,835
Write 2,090
Mixed 2,043
446% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 76.9
250% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,075
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 785
564% 746 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,876
Write 2283
Mixed 2,128
471% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 85.5
274% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 798
578% 767 MB/s
Poor: 270% Great: 601%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 66.3
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 60.7
184% 64.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 26.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 162%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical MS-17P2 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback