Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive682% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 08:57
Run Duration449 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$429
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 207
2-Core 365
118% 221 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,178
110% 914 Pts
64-Core 3,683
228% 3,683 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$250
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6056 6032 6064 4430 3537 3336 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
682% Outstanding
Read 5,949
Write 6,231
Mixed 3640
SusWrite 4,909
1,165% 5,182 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 87.6
283% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,785
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 1,549
1,071% 1,357 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 682%
Great: 926%
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$397
2.5TB free
Firmware: PACR5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5972 6026 2107 2162 2062 2101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
600% Outstanding
Read 6098
Write 6,540
Mixed 3,645
SusWrite 3,405
1,104% 4,922 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 88.4
286% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,867
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 1,655
1,138% 1,435 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 600%
Great: 994%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3669 3719 3713 3720 3666 3704 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 3,830
Mixed 2464
SusWrite 3,698
679% 2,978 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 72.2
240% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,791
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,599
1,144% 1,484 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 440%
Great: 530%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR40D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3661 3598 3677 3656 3612 3625 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 1,909
Write 3,756
Mixed 2480
SusWrite 3,638
672% 2,946 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 70.1
234% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 2,052
DQ Write 1,565
DQ Mixed 1,783
1,340% 1,800 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 451%
Great: 530%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$190
899GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 489 493 492 492 493 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 459
Mixed 416
SusWrite 492
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.5
190% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
329GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 492 492 492 492 492 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 416
SusWrite 492
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.4
190% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
203% Outstanding
MC Read 73.5
MC Write 79.6
MC Mixed 73.6
216% 75.6 GB/s
SC Read 49.7
SC Write 69.9
SC Mixed 59.9
171% 59.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 153%
This bench: 203%
Great: 292%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 0R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 138 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback