Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZV4
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240415
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 08:36
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
76% 145 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 612
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 277D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 22.4
14% 21.1 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 17.2
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,504
Write 3,229
Mixed 2,353
674% 3,029 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 89.2
331% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 890
682% 933 MB/s
Poor: 198% Great: 485%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback