| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Positivo POS-AG31AP (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Positivo POS-AG31AP |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101029 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '18 at 18:22 |
| Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.3%
Below average
|
38% 59.8 Pts
|
11% 78.1 Pts
|
5% 83.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
POV(1ACC 961D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
3% 3.79 fps
|
4% 5.22 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
75% 100 MB/s
|
107% 0.78 MB/s
| |
|
Excelstor Technology J8160S 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
20.6%
Poor
|
20% 27.3 MB/s
|
92% 0.85 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
8% 2.67 GB/s
|
32% 125 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical POS-AG31AP Builds (Compare 26 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Positivo POS-AG31AP
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 3x |
| Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples | 2x |
| Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 5x |
| GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $138 |