Today's hottest deals

Asrock H370M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock H370M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 590
69% 536 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$148
PNY(196E 1361) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 55.8
43% 62.4 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 44.1
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 182 127 134 140 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 440
Write 432
Mixed 345
SusWrite 184
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 45.7
156% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 154
125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 9% 57 205 55 240 27" 1920 1080 SAM727E Odyssey G40B
Typical H370M-HDV Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback