Today's hottest deals

Intel LAPQC71A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) LAPQC71A
MotherboardIntel LAPQC71A  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '24 at 11:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 688
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Intel(8086 2086) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6070
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 131
Parallax 80.9
77% 102 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 69.7
64% 79.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 417 425 428 427 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 665
Write 662
Mixed 582
SusWrite 484
135% 598 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65
216% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 895
675% 913 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 164%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H2666G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 19.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 50% 4 54 26 144 15.5" 1536 793 BOE084D
Typical LAPQC71A Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Intel LAPQC71A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback