Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RR
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 21:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,011
95% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,307
81% 1,307 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 13ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 226
Parallax 146
129% 177 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 119
Splatting 115
111% 140 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7301Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,632
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,571
378% 1,688 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50.1
196% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 1047
DQ Mixed 1,124
851% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 283%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 360
Write 27.6
Mixed 35.3
113% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 6.9
551% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 39.7
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 29.2
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback