Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504ZA
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 327
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 750
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 286D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5592
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 19.3
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 0.2
11% 15.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1181 1216 1218 573 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,231
Mixed 1,159
SusWrite 907
269% 1,200 MB/s
4K Read 82.7
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 108
380% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 1,134
DQ Mixed 825
688% 985 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 280%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Kingston 9905795-002.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 31.6
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 21.7" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback