1015431595526131271 11213202692381210446

Performance Results

Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
System1015431595526131271 11213202692381210446  (all builds)
Motherboard27739127732776325972 25060209701606815010
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$149
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 300
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 913
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 181
Parallax 16.6
109% 110 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 75.1
78% 98.7 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 58 133 944 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,730
Write 1,178
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 310
237% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 31
136% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 533
480% 722 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 165%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 23% 22 120 47 240 31.5" 1920 1057 AOC3202 32G2WG8
Typical 11213202692381210446 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 122%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 114%

System: 1015431595526131271 11213202692381210446

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback