Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:52
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 69
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 940
95% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$299
Asus(1043 8843) ≥ 4GB; Asus KO RTX 3070
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 200
Parallax 193
172% 202 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 146
Splatting 129
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,708
Write 264
Mixed 505
178% 826 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 57.3
198% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 533
379% 495 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 320%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
909GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 528
Write 573
Mixed 524
121% 542 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 33.8
113% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 324
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS242B ASUS VG247Q1A
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 102%
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback