Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74%
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 75%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$212
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,118
105% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,558
96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$255
MSI(1462 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 90.8
81% 92 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 66.5
60% 75 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,382
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,550
349% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 87.2
305% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 930
683% 893 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 274%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
559GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 171 184 185 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 162
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 182
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1920 1057 BNQ7951 BenQ EW2480
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback