Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 101%
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:30
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 333
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,155
110% 911 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 192
Parallax 195
96% 168 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 133
Splatting 89.5
89% 111 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata FALCON 512GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1144 1147 539 295 210 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,828
Write 1,123
Mixed 197
SusWrite 579
205% 932 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 43
114% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 386
337% 480 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 169%
Great: 232%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
740GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 158 166 162 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 160
39% 54.7 MB/s
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 75 27" 1280 720 ACR058F Acer KG271
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 74%
Workstation 28%

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback