Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 days ago, 13 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:29
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 322
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 105
Parallax 136
124% 131 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 126
Splatting 104
111% 141 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 346 354 301 304 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 418
Mixed 352
SusWrite 311
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 48.5
155% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 161
174% 290 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 927 28 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV
Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback