Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 328
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 927
96% 770 Pts
64-Core 1123
70% 1123 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 23.3
13% 22.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 25
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 142 70 43 105 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 448
Write 414
Mixed 369
SusWrite 79.9
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 0.3
66% 155 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 27" 1280 720 LHC2700 VN27C165
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback