Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

Gaming 49%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 50%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory41.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 247
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 871
82% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 68.3
55% 71.1 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 69.3
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 355
Mixed 16.7
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 0.7
30% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 120GB-$33
56GB free
Firmware: 03090005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 124 44 47 47 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 475
Write 299
Mixed 310
SusWrite 85.7
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 10.1
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 116
92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
267GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 125 122 130 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 124
Write 168
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 127
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 23.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 15% 46 192 12 60 21.5" 1920 1017 DAC0000 Monitor
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 75%
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback