Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Gaming 195%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 217%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 209
2-Core 421
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,516
142% 1,179 Pts
64-Core 2,464
152% 2,464 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 220
Parallax 235
199% 233 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 162
Splatting 132
144% 183 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,767
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,940
447% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 93.9
341% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,915
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 166
442% 969 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Corsair MP600 CORE XT 2TB
565GB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 202 270 335 203 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 2,525
Mixed 2,131
SusWrite 328
382% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 272
4K Mixed 86.5
337% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,566
DQ Mixed 1773
1,329% 1,778 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 274%
Great: 535%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 35.6
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 18% 50 200 27 165 31.5" 2560 1440 GBT3205 M32QC
Typical GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 101%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback