Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

Gaming 53%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$58
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 363
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.3% Good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 81.9
69% 85.1 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 71.4
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 117 130 179 132 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 374
Write 398
Mixed 302
SusWrite 165
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 27.1
105% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 313
249% 348 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 110%
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
191GB free
Firmware: 1C85205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 352 351 378 339 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 451
Write 381
Mixed 273
SusWrite 346
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 33.8
121% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 185
159% 233 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 465 4 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP2954 HP ZR2440w
Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback