Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:23
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 215
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 437
57% 431 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.3
73% 96.9 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 95.3
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 24 46 24 118 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 442
Write 366
Mixed 272
SusWrite 91.6
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 16.6
63% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 34.5
40% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AU016G-H3200GST 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA0B9 DELL U2415
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback