Performance Results

Gaming 379%
Desktop 120%
Workstation 485%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics327% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive647% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D69
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:23
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$565
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 215
2-Core 422
125% 240 Pts
4-Core 845
8-Core 1,596
145% 1,220 Pts
64-Core 3,686
228% 3,686 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,739
Asus(1043 88F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
327% Outstanding
Lighting 484
Reflection 581
Parallax 818
394% 628 fps
MRender 535
Gravity 576
Splatting 277
360% 463 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 327%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T705 M.2 2TB-$282
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5474 5351 5381 5277 3716 3721 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
647% Outstanding
Read 5,530
Write 5,477
Mixed 3607
SusWrite 4,820
1,093% 4,858 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 79.9
257% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1580
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 1,345
945% 1,214 MB/s
Poor: 405%
This bench: 647%
Great: 1731%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$283
3TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2823 3397 3390 3394 3460 3522 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
474% Outstanding
Read 2,877
Write 3,854
Mixed 3,257
SusWrite 3331
755% 3,330 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 92.6
302% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,593
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1,383
1,035% 1,387 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 474%
Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
268% Outstanding
MC Read 163
MC Write 68
MC Mixed 82.3
298% 104 GB/s
SC Read 50.8
SC Write 75.8
SC Mixed 56.2
174% 60.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 268%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 5R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 8% 52 215 59 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71FF QBQ90
History: Score 20: 0P 4R 0G 0B | Score 26: 0P 5R 0G 1B
Typical MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69) Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 402%
Desktop 116%
Workstation 527%

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback