Asrock B550M Pro4

Performance Results

Gaming 118%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 113%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:16
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$76
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 275
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 846
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8842) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 188
Parallax 178
168% 191 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
118% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 919 889 896 894 882 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 1,198
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 902
262% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 83
273% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1,053
795% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 244%
Great: 372%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
514GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4165 2779 1619 1443 1450 1413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2,481
Write 3,821
Mixed 3,304
SusWrite 2,145
666% 2,938 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 109
353% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,152
855% 1140 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 391%
Great: 601%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 217 218 216 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 27
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 48 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2705 VG27AQL1A
Typical B550M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 109%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 102%

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback