Monster TULPAR T5 V19.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V19.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V19.2
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:16
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 500
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 79.7
5% 31.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 972
Write 1,199
Mixed 726
216% 965 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 73.7
245% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 734
552% 744 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 261%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
160GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 545 545 545 546 541 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 974
Write 1,058
Mixed 465
SusWrite 590
173% 772 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 34.4
150% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 118
104% 163 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 129%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 21.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 24.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0804
Typical TULPAR T5 V19.2 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V19.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback