MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results

Gaming 24%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:14
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 147
70% 113 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 195
34% 236 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 32.2
28% 35.2 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 30.2
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 117 59 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 475
Write 407
Mixed 356
SusWrite 91
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 33.6
113% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 238
193% 273 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$23
477GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 151 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 108
Write 116
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 151
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2648 2TB
810GB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 93.4
Write 93.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 89.3
113% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.4
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3579 HP 27m
Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 24%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 20%

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback