Performance Results

Gaming 64%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 50%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 402
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 84.8
75% 89.1 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 80.5
Splatting 73.6
71% 88.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 14 15 14 3.6 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 431
Write 338
Mixed 289
SusWrite 44.5
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 18.3
67% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 52.8
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 43.3
37% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 55%
Apacer AS340 120GB
46GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 143 63 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 458
Write 340
Mixed 316
SusWrite 114
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 32.1
133% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 194
170% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 91%
836GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 95 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 86.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 94.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$70
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G5
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 106%
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback