MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 47
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 128
46% 81 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 12.2
5% 8.6 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 261 258 260 257 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 436
Write 400
Mixed 344
SusWrite 269
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 38.2
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 291
218% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
859GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 175 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 163
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 175
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA02D DELL E248WFP
Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback