Performance Results

Gaming 50%
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 46%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 719
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 69.5
58% 72.1 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 68.3
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 32 30 29 30 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 417
Write 444
Mixed 393
SusWrite 47.2
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 37.9
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 189
170% 254 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
407GB free
Firmware: CC33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 71 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 125
Write 82.1
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 71.3
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 44.9" 1280 720 KTC4200
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback