Monster ABRA A5 V19.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V19.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V19.1
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 10:57
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 59.8
1-Core 184
2-Core 341
100% 195 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 755
84% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1177) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver.
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 14.8
10% 16 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 16.5
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 50.7
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 39.4
41% 45.5 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 38
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,391
Write 1,562
Mixed 1,334
320% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 60.3
218% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,172
900% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 35.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 1R 3G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 19% 73 216 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ABRA A5 V19.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 25%
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 25%

System: Monster ABRA A5 V19.1

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback