Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 10:55
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 94.4
52% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 94.5
13% 94.6 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 38.7
31% 39.5 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 28.6
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 294 302 306 309 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 368
Write 397
Mixed 369
SusWrite 301
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 43.8
143% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 156
120% 163 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 F6451U67G1600G 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM75F0 32LG3000
Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback