Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 days ago, 13 days ago.
SystemAsrock A620M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620M-HDV/M.2
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 10:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$177
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 205
2-Core 411
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1,122
113% 918 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 109%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 191
Parallax 386
152% 255 fps
MRender 343
Gravity 148
Splatting 223
192% 238 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12575
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2436 2338 2346 1170 946 851 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 1,956
Write 2,600
Mixed 1375
SusWrite 1,681
429% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 96
342% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,522
DQ Write 1,321
DQ Mixed 659
702% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 350%
Great: 348%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5BU016G-6000LA 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 66.8
186% 65 GB/s
SC Read 54.1
SC Write 68.3
SC Mixed 57.2
171% 59.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 179%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 IVM66A7 PL2755H
Typical A620M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

System: Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback