Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

Performance Results

Gaming 264%
Desktop 116%
Workstation 255%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive412% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 days ago, 13 days ago.
SystemAsrock B650M Pro RS WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M Pro RS WiFi
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 09:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$177
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 215
2-Core 419
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 753
8-Core 1,232
121% 992 Pts
64-Core 1,404
87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 111%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$732
Gigabyte(1458 40EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 361
Reflection 347
Parallax 371
294% 360 fps
MRender 486
Gravity 303
Splatting 217
261% 335 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11778
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2998 2947 2141 1579 1368 880 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
412% Outstanding
Read 3,519
Write 3,668
Mixed 2517
SusWrite 1,986
656% 2,922 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67
227% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2,078
DQ Write 1,530
DQ Mixed 1,803
1,348% 1,804 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 412%
Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-DTLABBK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5800 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
156% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 58.3
160% 55.9 GB/s
SC Read 46.1
SC Write 67
SC Mixed 55.2
160% 56.1 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 156%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 29% 14 216 57 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G3R3B
Typical B650M Pro RS WiFi Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 251%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 255%

System: Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback