Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 08:42
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$177
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 208
2-Core 407
121% 233 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1199
115% 950 Pts
64-Core 1,414
88% 1,414 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$455
Palit(1569 F302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 326
Parallax 334
257% 325 fps
MRender 472
Gravity 274
Splatting 221
252% 322 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 225%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria PRO SSD 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFA10.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,361
Write 4,104
Mixed 2,716
690% 3,060 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 80.1
251% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,156
DQ Write 1,485
DQ Mixed 1,885
1,390% 1,842 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 460%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3238F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 69.8
MC Mixed 57.2
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.2
SC Write 61.4
SC Mixed 53.8
154% 53.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 164%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 MSI3CB5 MSI MAG275R
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback