Asrock WRX90 WS EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics366% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock WRX90 WS EVO  (all builds)
Memory116.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 07:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 186
2-Core 377
111% 214 Pts
4-Core 743
8-Core 1,484
131% 1,114 Pts
64-Core 3,476
215% 3,476 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,739
Asus(1043 88EF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
366% Outstanding
Lighting 579
Reflection 570
Parallax 710
472% 620 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 571
Splatting 264
354% 456 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 366%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB-$92
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4327
Write 4,302
Mixed 3194
878% 3,941 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 75.1
258% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,952
DQ Write 1,487
DQ Mixed 1,674
1,264% 1,705 MB/s
Poor: 256% Great: 615%
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$342
3.5TB free
Firmware: PACR5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,770
Write 4,393
Mixed 3,248
851% 3,803 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 83.8
273% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,637
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1433
1,046% 1,377 MB/s
Poor: 415% Great: 994%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF564R32-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
363% Outstanding
MC Read 121
MC Write 158
MC Mixed 163
421% 147 GB/s
SC Read 45.7
SC Write 71.4
SC Mixed 60.6
169% 59.2 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 264%
This bench: 363%
Great: 490%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 164 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback