Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 256%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 266%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics314% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 07:26
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 307
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 928
89% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,739
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
314% Outstanding
Lighting 463
Reflection 525
Parallax 733
377% 574 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 546
Splatting 286
348% 444 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 314%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,134
Write 1215
Mixed 1,148
261% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.4
197% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 943
670% 846 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 102 100 102 100 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 182
Write 124
Mixed 102
SusWrite 102
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 10
52% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 61.8
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 51.6
39% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
115GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 165 207 139 163 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 360
Write 476
Mixed 127
SusWrite 173
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 33.5
148% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 182
155% 232 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81%
Great: 115%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
458GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 74.5
102% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.4
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 24.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 48.7" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback