Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 07:02
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$350
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 212
2-Core 424
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 829
8-Core 1,649
146% 1,239 Pts
64-Core 2,880
178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 114
Parallax 156
136% 145 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 131
Splatting 105
114% 144 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE220S 512GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT8KA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,243
Write 1,994
Mixed 1,366
415% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 74
240% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 1298
DQ Mixed 458
502% 822 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 318%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
643GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.4
Write 47.8
Mixed 36.9
52% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 67%
28GB free, PID d33a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 29.4
Write 15.7
Mixed 15
23% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
36% 0.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 68.8
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 57.9
176% 61.6 GB/s
SC Read 52.9
SC Write 64.7
SC Mixed 53.9
163% 57.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 170%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN3704 HP M22f FHD
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 413%
Desktop 117%
Workstation 420%

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $2,427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback