MSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E24
MotherboardMSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 07:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$190
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 203
2-Core 396
119% 227 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1,189
124% 995 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 117%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$500
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 318
Parallax 339
257% 324 fps
MRender 465
Gravity 270
Splatting 217
248% 317 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 223%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11778
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,472
Write 3,659
Mixed 2689
731% 3,274 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.8
249% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2118
DQ Write 1,511
DQ Mixed 1,615
1,260% 1,748 MB/s
Poor: 255% Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 65.3
MC Mixed 63.5
180% 62.9 GB/s
SC Read 54.2
SC Write 60.7
SC Mixed 58.6
165% 57.8 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 174%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 KTC3202 Q3202S
Typical B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24) Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback