Ibuypower AMD

Performance Results

Gaming 214%
Desktop 113%
Workstation 218%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIbuypower AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 05:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,363
122% 1,032 Pts
64-Core 1,617
100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$499
Asus(1043 895A) ≥ 4GB; DUAL-RTX4070-O12G-EVO
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 270
Parallax 319
223% 288 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 242
Splatting 192
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 195%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$165
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 1121 1109 1103 1091 1086 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2662
Write 2,587
Mixed 1946
SusWrite 1,122
466% 2,079 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 96.2
326% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1283
968% 1,302 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 334%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.1
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.5
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM772A 32GK650F
Typical AMD Builds (Compare 1,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 127%
Desktop 102%
Workstation 126%

System: Ibuypower AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback