Performance Results

Gaming 190%
Desktop 102%
Workstation 182%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D98
MotherboardMSI PRO B760-P WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D98)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 00:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 176
2-Core 312
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,003
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,203
74% 1,203 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$455
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 289
Parallax 308
215% 287 fps
MRender 453
Gravity 269
Splatting 215
244% 313 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 200%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$66
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 856 588 881 877 592 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 944
Write 795
Mixed 680
SusWrite 766
179% 796 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 45.2
200% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,203
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 512
492% 790 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 186%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 36.5
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 33.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 28 60 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25AC VG259QR
Typical PRO B760-P WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D98) Builds (Compare 1,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 224%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 246%

Motherboard: MSI PRO B760-P WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D98)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback