Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 78%
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 74%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 23:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 309
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 934
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1183
73% 1183 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 112
Parallax 97.2
82% 103 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 87.8
81% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09843
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,968
Write 2,278
Mixed 1634
438% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68.3
221% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 637
564% 843 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 264%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
291GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 110
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DDR4 8GB 2666MHz 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 14% 42 215 58 240 24.5" 1920 1057 VIE2700 Z PRO 240H
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 102%
Desktop 104%
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback