Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 22:36
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 938
84% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,611
100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$500
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 215
Parallax 205
198% 221 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 160
Splatting 131
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1243 877 937 1130 615 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,294
Write 1,957
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 1,105
337% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 54.3
197% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 816
593% 777 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 214%
Great: 333%
Plextor PX-1TM9PeY 1TB
140GB free
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 394 340 341 301 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1649
Write 413
Mixed 325
SusWrite 346
148% 683 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 52.1
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 565
432% 604 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 169%
Great: 267%
WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB-$90
207GB free
Firmware: 620281WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2192 1511 663 681 711 734 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 2,064
Mixed 1,916
SusWrite 1082
404% 1,797 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 62.9
230% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 986
746% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 267%
Great: 615%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$220
988GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 111 106 98 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 103
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$220
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 171 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 163
Mixed 108
SusWrite 170
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 28.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 14% 28 212 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 IVM7608 PL3270Q
History: Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B | Score 25: 0P 2R 3G 6B
Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $949
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback