Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:31
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 264
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 595
65% 515 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 27.2
19% 25.6 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 34
Splatting 21.3
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 59.6
56% 74.9 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 50.3
50% 64 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,338
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,183
285% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 737
534% 711 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 144 15.5" 2560 1369 BOE090F
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 18%
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 16%

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback