Asus X510UNR

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 51%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X510UNR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UNR
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 102
49% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 348
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 163E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.3
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 252 149 151 142 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 421
Write 447
Mixed 351
SusWrite 201
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 29.7
100% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 295
216% 280 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
679GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 122 116 111 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 73.4
Write 117
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 118
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical X510UNR Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UNR

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback