Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605VC
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 221
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 355
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 18B3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5599
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 33.9
25% 34.9 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 41.6
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,771
Write 2,725
Mixed 1,738
467% 2078 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 33.8
214% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 1,025
748% 984 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 367%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 29.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 21.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B2B
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605VC_K3605VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback