MSI MS-16R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 106
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 291
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 127E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2128
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 6.1
4% 6.3 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.2
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 255
Mixed 363
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 333
240% 313 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 126%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 100 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 75.7
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 103
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 60 15.5" 1920 997 LGD0563
Typical MS-16R3 Builds (Compare 2,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback