Performance Results

Gaming 147%
Desktop 104%
Workstation 164%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240312
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 183
2-Core 365
109% 209 Pts
4-Core 706
8-Core 1,305
120% 1,006 Pts
64-Core 2,225
138% 2,225 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600-XT
XFX(1EAE 7605) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 194
Parallax 311
134% 223 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 188
Splatting 224
180% 220 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 138%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 60 32 120 16 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 114
Write 96.5
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 74.7
21% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 10.8
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 258GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 120 110 98 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 477
Write 439
Mixed 356
SusWrite 128
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 38
131% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 165
152% 234 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30.6
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 28.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 120 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 142%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback